Guide to Authors | European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2022)

Peer Review Terminology
European Journal of Clinical Nutritionand Springer Nature are participating in apilotofNISO/STM's Working Group on Peer ReviewTerminology.

The National Information Standards Organization (NISO) and STM, the International Association of Scientific, Technology and Medical Publishers have recognized a need to identify and standardize definitions and terminology in peer review practices in order to help alignnomenclature as more publishers use open peer review models.

Apeer review terminology that is used across publishers will help make the peer review process for articles and journals more transparent, and will enable the community to better assess and compare peer review practices between different journals.

The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

  • Identity transparency:Single anonymized
  • Reviewer interacts with:Editor
  • Review information published:None

The full terminologyisdetailed here.

We would welcome feedback on the Peer Review Terminology Pilot. Please can you take the time to complete this shortsurvey.

Please Note:Manuscripts based on animal nutrition and in vitro studies will not be considered. Papers reporting validation of generally accepted methodologies in specific population groups and prevalence or incidence data on nutritional problems from countries have very low priority. When validation studies and prevalence or incidence data specific to countries are submitted for publication to the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, they will be processed only if they are submitted as a brief communication with the clear understanding that supplementary data will be made available by the authors to anyone interested in compiling regional or global comparisons.

Article Type Specifications

Article:An Article is a substantial, in-depth, novel research study or reportof current or basic clicnical research which is of interest to the readership of the journal. TheEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutritionstrongly encourages authors adhere to the reporting guidelines relevant to their specific research design. Any clinical trials submitted to theEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition must adhere to the registration requirements listed in the Editorial Policies.The structure an Article should follow is detailed below.
Specifications:Structured abstract (Background/Objectives; Subjects/Methods; Results; Conclusion) max. 250 words; Main body of text (excluding abstract, tables/figures, and references) not to exceed 3,000 words; Max 6tables or figures; Max 50 references (please use as recent as possible)

Review Article (including Statistical Reviews and Meta-Analyses):A Review Article is a comprehensive analyses of specific topics or a balanced survey of recent developments in a research field. Proposals for reviews may be submitted by sending a covering letter and abstract to the Editor for consideration. PLEASE NOTE: All reviews should include search criteria and selection criteria in a Methods Section, along with the total number of articles identified and the total number selected for inclusion in the review. All invited reviews will undergo peer review prior to acceptance.When submitting a Meta-Analyses paper please select the article type ‘Review Article’.Please adhere to the PRISMA Guidelines. For full details see the Editorial Policies.
Specifications:Unstructured abstract max. 250 words; Main body of text (excluding abstract, tables/figures, and references) not to exceed 5,000 words; Max 8tables or figures; Max 100 references

Case Report:These fall short of the criteria for full Articles (e.g. preliminary experiments limited by sample size or duration, or novel hypotheses). Apart from including an abstract, there is no strict obligation to divide the text into sections but structuring according to case history, major findings, discussion and conclusions (i.e. what can we learn from this case?) is recommended.
Specifications:Unstructured abstract max. 150 words; Main body of text (excluding abstract, tables/figures, and references) not to exceed 1,000 words; Max 2tables or figures; Max 10 references

(Video) The European Journal of Clinical Nutrition celebrates 30 years

Brief Communication:These are studies that fall short of the criteria for full Articles (e.g. preliminary experiments limited by sample size or duration, or novel hypotheses). Apart from including an abstract, there is no obligation to divide the text into sections.
Specifications:Unstructured abstract max. 150 words; Main body of text (excluding abstract, tables/figures, and references) not to exceed 1,000 words; Max 2tables or figures; Max 10 references

Correspondence:Correspondences provide readers with a forum for comment on papers published in the journal or to address new issues relevant to the research community. A correspondence must reference the original source but can use an arbitrary title.
Specifications:No abstract required; Main body of text (excluding tables/figures, and references) not to exceed 750 words; Max 2tables or figures; Max 10references (not including reference to the original article, if it is aEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition article)

Comment:Comments discuss issues of particular significance to the field, or highlight significant papers inEJCNor eleswhere. Comments are usually solicited, however if you wish to offer an unsolicited contribution, we ask you to send a short description to the Editorial Office first.
Specifications:No abstract required; Main body of text (excluding tables/figures, and references) not to exceed 1,000 words; Max 2tables or figures; Max 10references

Perspective:Perspectives are a hybrid between a commentary and a review, providing an opinion-driven perspective on a particular research topic or field of interest to the European Journal of Clinical Nutritionreadership. Authors should present a (provocative) view that can be supported by data and literature with the goal of sparking debate and stimulating future research avenues.
Specifications: No abstract required; Main body of text (excluding tables/figures, and references) not to exceed 2,000 words; Max of 4 tables and/or figures; Max 25references

Mini Review:Mini-Reviews should focus on a clearly defined topic of current interest, and describe recent developments in the field
Specifications: Unstructured abstract max. 200 words; Main body of text (excluding abstract, tables/figures, and references) not to exceed 3,000 words; Max of 6tables and/or figures; Max 50 references

Editorial(by Editor invitation only): Proposals for Editorials may be submitted;however, authors should only send an outline of the proposed paper for initial consideration.
Specifications: No abstract required; Main body of text (excluding tables/figures, and references) not to exceed 1,000 words; Max of 2 tables and/or figures; Max 5references

Preparation of Articles

House Style:Authors should adhere to the following formatting guidelines

  • Text should be double spaced with a wide margin.
  • All pages and lines are to be numbered.
  • Do not make rules thinner than 1pt (0.36mm).
  • Use a coarse hatching pattern rather than shading for tints in graphs.
  • Colour should be distinct when being used as an identifying tool.
  • Commas, not spaces should be used to separate thousands.
  • At first mention of a manufacturer, the town (and state if USA) and country should be provided.
  • Statistical methods:For normally distributed data, mean (SD) is the preferred summary statistic. Relative risks should be expressed as odds ratios with 95% confidence interval. To compare two methods for measuring a variable the method of Bland & Altman (1986, Lancet 1, 307–310) should be used; for this, calculation of P only is not appropriate.
  • Units:Use metric units (SI units) as fully as possible. Preferably give measurements of energy in kiloJoules or MegaJoules with kilocalories in parentheses (1 kcal = 4.186kJ). Use % throughout.
  • Abbreviations: On first using an abbreviation place it in parentheses after the full item. Very common abbreviations such asFFA, RNA, need not be defined. Note these abbreviations: gramg; litrel; milligrammg; kilogramkg; kilojoule kJ; megajouleMJ; weightwt; secondss; minutesmin; hoursh. Do not add ‘s’ for plural units.Terms used less than four times should not be abbreviated.

Please note that articles must contain the following components. Please see below for further details:

  • Title page (excluding acknowledgements)
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Materials (or Subjects) and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Data Availability Statement
  • References
  • Acknowledgments
  • Author Contribution Statement
  • Funding
  • Ethical Approval
  • Competing Interests
  • Figure legends
  • Tables
  • Figures

Reports of clinical trials must adhere to theregistration and reporting requirements listed in theEditorial Policies.

Cover Letter:Authors should provide a cover letter that includes the affiliation and contact information for the corresponding author. Authors should briefly discuss the importance of the work and explain why it is considered appropriate for the diverse readership of the journal.The cover letter should confirm the material is original research, has not been previously published and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration. If the manuscript has been previously considered for publication in another journal, please include the previous reviewer comments, to help expedite the decision by the Editorial team.

Title Page:The title page should contain:

(Video) european journal & clinical nutrition

  • Title of the paper - brief, informative, of 150 characters or less and should not make a statement or conclusion
  • Full names of all the authors and their affiliations, as well as the e-mail address of the corresponding author. If authors regard it as essential to indicate that two or more co-authors are equal in status, they may be identified by an asterisk symbol with the caption ‘These authors contributed equally to this work’ immediately under the address list.
  • Consortia: For papers containing one or more consortia, all members of the consortium who meet the criteria for authorship must be listed individually as authors on the title page. The name of the consortia needs to also be on the title page and listed as an author (e.g. The BP Consortia). However, phrases such as “on behalf of” should not be used. If necessary, individual authors can be listed in both the main author list and as a member of a consortium. When submitting your manuscript via the online submission system, the consortium name should be entered as an author, together with the contact details of a nominated consortium representative. The Consortium should be mentioned in the Acknowledgements section, not as an Author, when it is made up of a group of people who do not meet authorship criteria. Seeherefor further consortia formatting guidelines, which should be adhered to prior to acceptance.

Abstract:Articles must be prepared with a structured abstract designed to summarise the essential features of the paper in a logical and concise sequence under the following mandatory headings:

  • Background/Objectives:What was the main question or hypothesis tested?
  • Subjects/Methods:How many subjects were recruited, how many dropped out? Was the study randomised, case-controlled etc? Interventions/methods used and duration of administration
  • Results:Indicate 95% confidence intervals and exactPvalues
  • Conclusions:Answer (significant or not) to main question

Graphical Abstracts (optional): A graphical abstract, which summarizes the manuscript in a visual way, is designed to attract the attention of readers in the table of contents of the journal. The graphic should be submitted as a single file using a standard file format (.tiff, .eps, .jpg, .bmp, .doc, or .pdf.), it should be 9 cm wide x 5 cm high when printed at full scale and a minimum of 300 dpi. All graphical abstracts should be submitted with a white background and imagery should fill the available width, whenever possible. Colour graphical abstracts are encouraged and will be published at no additional charge. Textual statements should be kept to a minimum.

Introduction:The Introduction should assume that the reader is knowledgeable in the field and should therefore be as brief as possible but can include a short historical review where desirable.

Materials/Subjects and Methods:This section should contain sufficient detail, so that all experimental procedures can be reproduced, and include references. Methods, however, that have been published in detail elsewhere should not be described in detail. Authors should provide the name of the manufacturer and their location for any specifically named medical equipment and instruments, and all drugs should be identified by their pharmaceutical names, and by their trade name if relevant.

Results:The Results section should briefly present the experimental data in text, tables or figures. Tables and figures should not be described extensively in the text.

Discussion:The Discussion should focus on the interpretation and the significance of the findings with concise objective comments that describe their relation to other work in the area. It should not repeat information in the results. The final paragraph should highlight the main conclusion(s), and provide some indication of the direction future research should take.

Data Availability Statement:Please include a statement at the end of your paper that tells readers where the data generated or analysed during this study can be found e.g. within the published article and its supplementary files, within a recognised repository, with a link to the data in said repository, or if additional data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Please see theData Availability and Policypagefor more information.

References:Only papers directly related to the article should be cited. Exhaustive lists should be avoided. References should follow the Vancouver format. In the text they should appear as numbers starting at one and at the end of the paper they should be listed (double-spaced) in numerical order corresponding to the order of citation in the text. Where a reference is to appear next to a number in the text, for example following an equation, chemical formula or biological acronym, citations should be written as (ref. X).Example “detectable levels of endogenous Bcl-2 (ref. 3), as confirmed by western blot”.
All authors should be listed for papers with up to six authors; for papers with more than six authors, the first six only should be listed, followed byet al.Abbreviations for titles of medical periodicals should conform to those used in the latest edition of Index Medicus. The first and last page numbers for each reference should be provided. Abstracts and letters must be identified as such. Papers in press may be included in the list of references.
Personal communications can be allocated a number and included in the list of references in the usual way or simply referred to in the text; the authors may choose which method to use. In either case authors must obtain permission from the individual concerned to quote his/her unpublished work.

Journal article:
Neidlein, S, Wirth, R, Pourhassan, M. Iron deficiency, fatigue and muscle strength and function in older hospitalized patients.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020; 75:456–463.

Journal article by DOI:
Kurotani K, Shinsugi C, Takimoto H. Diet quality and household income level among students: 2014 National Health and Nutrition Survey Japan.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;

Journal article, in press:
Gallardo RL, Juneja HS, Gardner FH. Normal human marrow stromal cells induce clonal growth of human malignant T-lymphoblasts.Int. J Cell Cloning(in press).

(Video) Journals of the American Society for Nutrition

Complete book:
Atkinson K, Champlin R, Ritz J, Fibbe W, Ljungman P, Brenner MK (eds).Clinical Bone MarrowandBlood Stem Cell Transplantation.3rd ed. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, 2004.

Chapter in book:
Coccia PF. Hematopoietic cell transplantation for osteopetrosis. In: Blume KG, Forman SJ, Appelbaum FR (eds).Thomas' Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.3rd ed. Blackwell Publishing Ltd,Malden, 2004.pp 1443–1454.

Abstracts from the 2020 Annual Scientific Meeting of the British and Irish Hypertension Society (BIHS). J Hum Hypertens 34; 2020; 1–20

Kassambara A. rstatix: pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests. 2020.

Online Document:
Doe J. Title of subordinate document. In: The dictionary of substances and their effects. Royal Society of Chemistry. 1999. of subordinate document. Accessed 15 Jan 1999.

Acknowledgements:These should be brief, and should include sources of technical assistance, critical advice or other assistance, which contributed to the final manuscript.

Author Contributions:This section is mandatory. The individual contributions of authors to the manuscript should be specified in this section (for example JS designed experiments and helped write the manuscript; NAL contributed to data extraction and provided feedback on the report.Guidance and criteriafor authorship can be found in the section onAuthorshipon the Editorial Policies page.

Funding:The funding section is mandatory. Authors must declare sources of study funding including sponsorship (e.g. university, charity, commercial organization) and sources of material (e.g. novel drugs) not available commercially. If no financial assistance was received in support of the study, please include a statement to this fact here.

Ethical Approval
Authors must provide a statement regarding ethical approval (see information on HumanExperiments in the Editorial Policy section for further details). If ethical approval was not required, authors must provide an explanation of why it was not needed.

Competing Interests:Authors must declare whether or not there are any competing financial interests in relation to the work described. This information must be included at this stage and will be published as part of the paper. Please see the CompetingInterests section underEditorial Policiesfor detailed information.

Industry Funded Research:For papers that stem from industry based collaborations we apply the following categories:

(Video) Nicolaas Deutz. Clinical Nutrition; The Journal

Category 1:Studies financed by industry (in part or total) but with a clear declaration that the industry was not involved in the study hypothesis/design, execution, analysis, or interpretation.
Category 2:Studies sponsored by industry (in part or total), with a clear declaration that industry was involved in the study hypothesis/design, execution, analysis, or interpretation, and the industry involvement in each aspect is clearly outlined.
Category 3: Studies funded and conducted by industry, with no external partners. All submitted papers in categories 1 and 2 will need to address the following four points (1–3 from Mozafarrian[1]) in the cover letter orEJCNwill return the submission for completion.

  1. Statement that industry funding was transparent, acknowledged, and appropriately recognized throughout all stages of design, implementation, and reporting.
  2. Evidence presented that project design, implementation, analysis, and interpretation had been performed with efforts to maximize academic independence in each of these areas.
  3. Confirmation of full academic independence to report and publish all the findings.
  4. Statement that all raw data will be uploaded to a publically accessible repository, or be made available to interested scientists if requested; understanding that there could be reasonable caveats for such requests. Any restrictions on material availability or other relevant information to be divulged in the paper’s methods section, and should include details of how materials and information may be obtained.

When submitting the manuscript authors whose papers fall under category 2 or 3 must select the Subject Category ‘Industry Research’ from the dropdown list.

[1]Mozaffarian D. Conflict of interest and the role of the food industryin nutrition research. JAMA. 2017;317:1755–6.

Figure Legends:These should be brief, specific and appear on a separate manuscript page after the References section.

Tables:Tables should only be used to present essential data; they should not duplicate what is written in the text. All tables must be editable, ideally presented in Excel.Each must be uploaded as a separate workbook with a title or caption and be clearly labelled, sequentially. Please make sure each table is cited within the text and in the correct order, e.g. (Table 3). Please save the files with extensions .xls / .xlsx / .ods / or .doc or .docx. Please ensure that you provide a 'flat' file, with single values in each cell with no macros or links to other workbooks or worksheets and no calculations or functions.

Figures:Figures and images should be labelled sequentially and cited in the text. Figures should not be embedded within the text but rather uploaded as separate files.The use of three-dimensional histograms is strongly discouraged unless the addition of the third dimension is important for conveying the results. Composite figures containing more than three individual figures will count as two figures. All parts of a figure should be grouped together.Where possible large figures and tables should be included as supplementary material.
Detailed guidelines for submitting artwork can be found by downloading ourArtwork Guidelines.Using the guidelines, please submit production quality artwork with your initial online submission. If you have followed the guidelines, we will not require the artwork to be resubmitted following the peer-review process, if your paper is accepted for publication.

Colour Charges
There is a charge if authors choose to publish their figures in colour in print publication (which includes the online PDF). VAT or local taxes will be added where applicable.
Colour charges will NOTapply to authors who choose to pay an article processing charge to make their paper Open Access.

Number of colour illustrations








Cost: Rest of world







per figure

Graphs, Histograms and Statistics

  • Plotting individual data points is preferred to just showing means, especially where N<10
  • If error bars are shown, they must be described in the figure legend
  • Axes on graphs should extend to zero, except for log axes
  • Statistical analyses (including error bars and p values) should only be shown for independently repeated experiments, and must not be shown for replicates of a single experiment
  • The number of times an experiment was repeated (N) must be stated in the legend

Supplementary Information:Supplementary information is peer-reviewed material directly relevant to the conclusion of an article that cannot be included in the printed version owing to space or format constraints. The article must be complete and self-explanatory without the Supplementary Information, which is posted on the journal's website and linked to the article. Supplementary Information may consist of data files, graphics, movies or extensive tables. Please see ourArtwork Guidelinesfor information on accepted file types.
Authors should submit supplementary information files in the FINAL format as they are not edited, typeset or changed, and will appear online exactly as submitted. When submitting Supplementary Information, authors are required to:

(Video) 2021 Adult Critical Care Guidelines | Nutrition Support

  • Include a text summary (no more than 50 words) to describe the contents of each file.
  • Identify the types of files (file formats) submitted.

Please submit supplementary figures, small tables and text as a single combined PDF document. Tables longer than one page should be provided as an Excel or similar file type. For optimal quality video files please use H.264 encoding, the standard aspect ratio of 16:9 (4:3 is second best) and do not compress the video. Supplementary information is not copyedited, so please ensure that it is clearly and succinctly presented, and that the style and terminology conform to the rest of the manuscript, with any tracked-changes or Review mark-ups removed.

Please note:We do not allow the resupplying of Supplementary Information files for style reasons after a paper has been exported in production, unless there is a serious error that affects the science and, if by not replacing, it would lead to a formal correction once the paper has been published. In these cases we would make an exception and replace the file; however there are very few instances where a Supplementary Information file would be corrected post publication.

Subject Ontology:Choosing the most relevant and specific subject terms from our subject ontology will ensure that your article will be more discoverable and will appear on appropriate subject specific pages on, in addition to the journal’s own pages.Your article should be indexed with at least one, and up to four unique subject terms that describe the key subjects and concepts in your manuscript. Clickherefor help with this.


Is the European Journal of Nutrition reputable? ›

The overall rank of European Journal of Nutrition is 3723. According to SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), this journal is ranked 1.061.

Is European Journal of Clinical Nutrition peer-reviewed? ›

The European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (EJCN) is an international, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of human and clinical nutrition.

Is journal of Clinical Nutrition reliable? ›

AJCN has the most impact, the most influence, and the highest immediacy rating of any primary nutrition research journal. AJCN has an overall Impact Factor of 6.926 and a five-year Impact Factor of 7.506— making it the highest ranked, most cited primary research journal in the field of nutrition.

What is the impact factor of the journal of nutrition? ›

What is the most reliable nutrition website? › is a USDA-sponsored website that offers credible information to help you make healthful eating choices. It serves as a gateway to reliable information on nutrition, healthy eating, physical activity, and food safety for consumers.

What is the most reputable medical journal? ›

The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is recognized as the world's leading medical journal and website. Published continuously for over 200 years, NEJM delivers high-quality, peer-reviewed research and interactive clinical content to physicians, educators, researchers, and the global medical community.

What are the top peer-reviewed medical journals? ›

Top 5 Medical Journals In The World Everyone Should Know About
  • The Lancet. ...
  • New England Journal of Medicine. ...
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) ...
  • JAMA Internal Medicine. ...
  • The British Medical Journal (BMJ)
5 Apr 2022

Is Ijhsr Pubmed indexed? ›

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research (IJHSR) is an Indexed peer-reviewed open access journal which publishes original scientific articles, reviews and short communications that are not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Is European Neuropsychopharmacology peer-reviewed? ›

European Neuropsychopharmacology is a monthly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by Elsevier. It is the official journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Is clinical nutrition journal peer-reviewed? ›

The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is a peer reviewed journal from the American Society of Nutrition that publishes original research studies relevant t...

Is clinical nutritionist same as dietician? ›

The easiest way to explain the difference between dietitians and nutritionists is to understand that dietitians have all the skills of a nutritionist, plus further specialist training that enables them to work with patients in clinical settings.

What is the difference between clinical nutrition and dietetics? ›

Beyond this, clinical nutrition is more focused on how particular nutrients affect our bodies, while dietitians look at how our overall diet affects our bodies.

Is 3 a good impact factor for a journal? ›

In most fields, the impact factor of 10 or greater is considered an excellent score while 3 is flagged as good and the average score is less than 1.

Which journal has the highest impact factor? ›

Top 200 Highest Impact Factor Journals (2022)
  • CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians – Impact Factor: 286.13.
  • Lancet – Impact Factor: 202.731.
  • New England Journal of Medicine – Impact Factor: 176.079.
  • JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association – Impact Factor: 157.335.
12 Jun 2022

Which journal has best impact factor? ›

List of Top 100 Journals with Highest Impact Factor
  • Nature – Impact Factor: 42.78. ...
  • The New England Journal of Medicine – Impact Factor: 74.7. ...
  • Science – Impact Factor: 41.84. ...
  • IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition – Impact Factor: 45.17. ...
  • The Lancet – Impact Factor: 59.1.

Which accreditation is best for nutrition? ›

The Best Online Nutrition Certification Programs for 2022
  • Best Overall: Precision Nutrition Level 1 Certification.
  • Best for Basics: National Academy of Sports Medicine (NASM) Certified Nutrition Coach.
  • Best For Budgets: National Council on Strength and Fitness (NCSF) Sport Nutrition Specialist.
19 Oct 2022

What is the 5/20 rule? ›

Though not an end-all test, a quick way to read the percent daily values is to use the 5/20 rule. This says that if the %DV is less than 5% there is a low amount of this nutrient, while if the %DV is greater than 20% there is a high amount of this nutrient.

What type of nutrition study is the most reliable? ›

In general, randomized trials and cohort studies provide the best information when looking at the link between a certain factor (like diet) and a health outcome (like heart disease). These are studies done in laboratories on cells, tissue, or animals.

Which medical journal is easiest to publish? ›

Biomedical Journal

Biomedical Journal is a journal that publishes research in all fields of clinical and biomedical sciences.

How do you know if a journal article is reputable? ›

The credibility of a journal may be assessed by examining several key factors:
  1. Where is it indexed? Is the journal included or indexed in the major bibliographic databases for the field? ...
  2. What is its publishing history? How long has the journal been available? ...
  3. Is it peer-reviewed? ...
  4. What is its impact factor?

How do I find a reputable journal article? ›

Finding Scholarly Articles
  1. Look for publications from a professional organization.
  2. Use databases such as JSTOR that contain only scholarly sources.
  3. Use databases such as Academic Search Complete or other EBSCO databases that allow you to choose "peer-reviewed journals".

How do I find the best peer reviewed journals? ›

Here are a few major databases for finding peer-reviewed research sources in the humanities, social sciences, and sciences:
  1. MLA International Bibliography. This link opens in a new window. ...
  2. Web of Science (Core Collection) ...
  3. Academic Search Ultimate. ...
  4. IEEE Xplore. ...
  5. Scopus. ...
  6. Business Source Ultimate.
11 Oct 2022

How do I find a peer reviewed journal article? ›

How can I determine if an article I find online is peer-reviewed?
  1. Use the Journals and Newspaper Listing.
  2. Look up the journal title to find the journal's location.
  3. Find a database that contains the article full text and follow the link. ...
  4. Search for your article by Title with "Scholarly (Peer-Reviewed)" checked.

What is a highly ranked journal? ›

Top journals are generally considered to be those in the upper quartile (Q1) of SJR scores. Using the SCImago journal ranking tool, you can compare journals within a comprehensive list of professional scientific journals or narrow your search down to a specific field or discipline.

Is PubMed indexing good? ›

Benefits of Getting Indexed in PubMed

It increases trust in your journal's processes and commitment to science. This makes it easier to attract quality submissions.

What does it mean to be PubMed indexed? ›

Indexation of a journal is considered a reflection of its quality. Indexed journals are considered to be of higher scientific quality as compared to non-indexed journals. Indexation of medical journals has become a debatable issue.

Is PubMed a good journal? ›

PubMed delivers a publicly available search interface for MEDLINE as well as other NLM resources, making it the premier source for biomedical literature and one of the most widely accessible resources in the world.

Is European academic research peer-reviewed? ›

European Academic Research (EAR) is an international, peer-reviewed journal, published in English. Its multidisciplinary character invites researchers, especially those in the early stage of their career, to become part of the competitive academic publishing world.

How reliable is European Journal of Epidemiology? ›

As a high impact patform for your research, we are ranked 9th out of 193 public health journals in the JCR Science Citation Index Expanded.

What is the impact factor of neuroimage? ›

Who owns the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition? ›

It is now published by the American Society for Nutrition. The journal's editor-in-chief is Christopher P Duggan of Harvard Medical School. A poll conducted in 2009 by the Biomedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association identified the journal as among the "100 most influential journals ...

Why should I study clinical nutrition? ›

Help patients: Clinical nutrition specialists provide individual counseling and develop meal plans that can change lives and help patients who are dealing with diseases, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease or obesity-related cancers.

Is nutrition hard to study? ›

Is a nutrition major hard? Nutrition major is not as hard of a major as most. Some of the science classes are hard, but many of the upper division nutrition classes are easer because the concepts are applicable to everyday life.

Are clinical nutritionist a doctor? ›

As you can see from the information above, a nutritionist is not a doctor, but a doctor may be a nutritionist. Doctors who choose to become certified in nutrition can greatly expand their knowledge and abilities in dealing with clients' food and nutrition needs, especially as they relate to overall wellness.

Who is more qualified a dietician or a nutritionist? ›

Nutritionists specialise in general diet advice, feedback and encouragement. Unlike dietitians, nutritionists are not qualified to provide medical advice or medical nutrition therapy.

Can a clinical nutritionist diagnose? ›

A dietitian is an expert in dietetics, a branch of knowledge concerned with diet and its effects on health. A dietitian is qualified to diagnose and treat certain medical conditions, and they will commonly alter a client's nutrition based on a medical issue and/or individual goals.

What is the other name of Clinical Nutrition? ›

Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) is the use of specific nutrition services to treat an illness, injury, or condition. It was introduced in 1994 by the American Dietetic Association to better articulate the nutrition therapy process.

Is clinical nutritionist a good career? ›

' bogs down to the fact that it is a highly lucrative and well-paid job. A dietitian salary in India is quite high when one has achieved high prominence and excellence in the field.

Which is best clinical nutrition or nutrition and dietetics? ›

See both the courses are great and in general both the course have the curriculum structure very close. Now, the key factor between this two courses is that Clinical Nutrition & Dietetics is a more professional & applied course. So studying it increase the chances if you want to be a Dietician professionally.

Is European journal of Psychotraumatology peer-reviewed? ›

The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS).

Is the International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology peer-reviewed? ›

The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published by Oxford University Press.

How reliable is European journal of Epidemiology? ›

As a high impact patform for your research, we are ranked 9th out of 193 public health journals in the JCR Science Citation Index Expanded.

Is European Economic Review a good journal? ›

The overall rank of European Economic Review is 1775. According to SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), this journal is ranked 1.657.

Are peer-reviewed journals the best? ›

Peer review is now standard practice by most credible scientific journals, and is an essential part of determining the credibility and quality of work submitted.

How are peer-reviewed journals ranked? ›

Publication power approach (PPA) – the ranking position of each journal is based on the actual publishing behavior of leading tenured academics over an extended time period. As such, the journal's ranking position reflects the frequency at which these scholars published their articles in this journal.

Is European Journal of Education Studies predatory? ›

"European Journal of Educational Research" which has been published by ''Eurasian Society of Educational Research'' is using only website. A file of criminal complaint has been placed for a fraud website (as a predatory journal) that has been using our journal's name and logo on their website.

What are the top peer-reviewed medical journals? ›

Top 5 Medical Journals In The World Everyone Should Know About
  • The Lancet. ...
  • New England Journal of Medicine. ...
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) ...
  • JAMA Internal Medicine. ...
  • The British Medical Journal (BMJ)
5 Apr 2022

What is peer-reviewed international journal? ›

The Journal Invites Research articles that have significant impact on Scientific and academic community. All the Submitted papers will be assigned Unique Manuscript Number with in 24 hours after submission.

Is IJSR journal Pubmed indexed? ›

Benefits of IJSR Publication:

Indexed Journal with Cross Ref, Google Scholar, Index Medicus, Pubmed, Citation Index etc. Publication Acceptable in India and Over 100 Countries. Scientific Peer Reviewed Process.

What is the most accurate epidemiological study? ›

The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard in epidemiology. It can determine both cause and risk. However, it is generally only ethical to perform this kind of study for medical interventions to determine if they are safe and effective.

What is the impact factor of European journal? ›

High-impact Research

To celebrate our increased 2021 Journal Impact Factor™ of 4.424 (Journal Citation Reports, Clarivate 2022), make sure your reading list includes highly cited articles from recent years.

Is European academic research peer-reviewed? ›

European Academic Research (EAR) is an international, peer-reviewed journal, published in English. Its multidisciplinary character invites researchers, especially those in the early stage of their career, to become part of the competitive academic publishing world.

What are the big 5 economics journals? ›

Traditionally the top five journals in economics are: the American Economic Review, Econometrica, the Quarterly Journal of Economics, the Journal of Political Economy, and the Review of Economic Studies.

How reliable is Eurostat? ›

Eurostat and its partners in the ESS aim to provide relevant, impartial, reliable and comparable statistical data. Indeed, access to high-quality statistics and Eurostat's obligation for trustworthiness is enshrined in law.

What are the top five journals in economics a new meta ranking? ›

The top five journals of our meta–ranking are: Quarterly Journal of Economics, Journal of Financial Economics, Journal of Economic Literature, Journal of Finance, and Econometrica. There are three important issues pertaining to a journal ranking: The first issue concerns the number of ranked journals.


(Hassaan Tohid)
2. Nutrition and Cancer: Do’s and Don'ts
(University of California Television (UCTV))
3. Be Carb Smarter.
(The Science of Self-Care)
4. Integrating Nutrition in Care: Imperative to European Citizens’ Health - ORIGINAL
(The European Nutrition for Health Alliance ENHA)
5. Nutrition & Pressure Injuries Putting the New Guidelines Into Practice
(Nestlé Nutrition Institute)
6. Zeljko Krznaric. ESPEN Courses on Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism.
(Espen Org)

Top Articles

You might also like

Latest Posts

Article information

Author: Trent Wehner

Last Updated: 11/09/2022

Views: 6070

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (56 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Trent Wehner

Birthday: 1993-03-14

Address: 872 Kevin Squares, New Codyville, AK 01785-0416

Phone: +18698800304764

Job: Senior Farming Developer

Hobby: Paintball, Calligraphy, Hunting, Flying disc, Lapidary, Rafting, Inline skating

Introduction: My name is Trent Wehner, I am a talented, brainy, zealous, light, funny, gleaming, attractive person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.